Half the Sky, Half the Home
Half the Sky, Half the Home
A story of love, freedom, security, social legitimacy, commitment and the existential tension between living according to one's own choices and living within society.
About this English version: This is the English translation and English version of Abdur Rahim's original Shershabadia story “আদখ্যান আসমান” (Adhkhan Asman). The English version has been prepared for readers who may not read Shershabadia while retaining the original story's characters, events, conversations, philosophical ideas, emotional conflicts and conclusion.
The Beginning
It was a busy afternoon in Malda. The wet roads were shimmering with light after the rain. Rudra and Maya were sitting beside the window of their flat. An indescribable happiness seemed to flow between them. Their happiness felt heavier than a thousand words.
Their relationship was not nameless—they lived together. “Live-in relationship”—something society often considers a symbol of modernity, while many others look at it with suspicion.
Twisting the key around in his hand, Rudra said, “At last, we have a sky of our own, Maya.”
Maya smiled softly. She placed her shoulder bag on the floor and held the window grille. Outside, they could hear the sound of a kettle at a tea stall, the ringing bells of rickshaws, and the familiar noise of the familiar city.
Maya said, “Yes, we have a sky, Rudra. But when clouds gather in this sky, we will have to hold the umbrella ourselves. No one else will come forward to protect us.”
Rudra came and stood beside Maya. Gently placing his hand on her shoulder, he said, “Have we ever walked in search of a social umbrella? Our relationship is based on trust, not on a piece of paper.”
A Life of Freedom
Rudra and Maya had been together for three years. Rudra worked as a graphic designer for a multinational company, while Maya was a freelance content writer and translator. Both were independent-minded and believed in living according to their own ideas.
They did not want to bind themselves within the extravagance of traditional marriage, its legal complications, or religious rituals. They had decided to live together—a choice society called a “live-in relationship.”
But they soon realized that the path of such a relationship was far more slippery and uneven than they had imagined.
From the very first day they began looking for a home, they had to face countless brokers and landlords asking unnecessary questions.
“Could you show us your marriage certificate?” “Why are your surnames different?” “Won’t your parents come with you?”
Answering these questions again and again had exhausted them.
Finally, Sukomal Babu, the owner of this flat, agreed to rent it to them. He was a retired professor who lived alone. He did not ask for any certificate. He simply looked at the honesty in Rudra’s eyes and the straightforwardness in Maya’s words before handing them the keys.
However, before leaving, he had said, “You know what society is like. Take care of yourselves.”
Rudra and Maya had met at Gour Banga University. Both had been students of philosophy. Their deep discussions about Sartre’s “existential freedom,” Camus’s “absurdity,” and Freud’s unconscious mind continued day and night.
One day Maya had said, “Why must a relationship necessarily be a social contract? Can’t we make our own rules?”
Rudra had smiled and replied, “We are free human beings. If there is love, why do we need a piece of paper?”
It was on the foundation of this philosophy of freedom that they decided to live together. Their new life began in a small flat in the city.
At first, everything was joyful—cooking together at night, watching movies together, getting drenched in sudden rain, occasional playful romantic quarrels, and falling asleep beside each other.
Maya would think to herself, “This is life. No restrictions, only feelings and dreams.”
Freedom and Security
But human beings do not seek freedom alone. They also seek security. People look for stability within their relationships. Most people are bound by this instinct.
One day Maya asked, “Rudra, will we ever get married?”
Rudra hesitated for a moment before replying, “Marriage means social pressure. Do we really want to return to that old social structure?”
Maya fell silent.
A strange emptiness began to grow inside her.
From that day onward, subtle changes began to appear in their relationship.
Society and Social Legitimacy
Society could never fully accept them.
Maya’s father would call her and ask, “Whom are you living with? Are you married?”
She would not answer.
Rudra’s friends would joke, “You’ve already started a family!”
But behind those jokes was a certain pressure. When there is no “social legitimacy,” pressure begins to build within a relationship. Rudra and Maya were no exception.
One night Rudra returned home late.
Maya asked, “Where were you?”
“With some friends,” Rudra replied.
But suspicion had already entered Maya’s mind.
Where there is no clear commitment, the feeling of security also becomes weaker.
Maya began to wonder, “Does he really love me? Or is this simply a convenient relationship for him?”
The moments that had once brought them joy gradually began to feel heavy.
One day, while cooking, Maya asked, “What exactly is our relationship?”
Rudra replied irritably, “Does everything have to have a name?”
That answer broke Maya.
When a relationship has no definition, it becomes difficult to find meaning within it.
Gradually, they began to drift apart even while living in the same room.
Rudra became increasingly absorbed in his work. Maya withdrew into herself.
“We live together, but are we really together?”
She had no answer to that question.
One night at the dinner table, Rudra said, “You know, Mom called today.”
Maya stopped tearing a piece of bread. “What did Auntie say?”
“The same thing. How long are you going to continue like this? Some kind of social recognition is necessary. How am I supposed to face people? I explained to her that we are happy. But a mother is a mother. She simply cannot get rid of her fear of society.”
Maya sighed. “The fear isn’t entirely false, Rudra. My father has stopped communicating with me too. He thinks I have brought shame upon his social standing.”
The Hospital Crisis
Just when the tension in their relationship had reached its peak, a major storm struck their lives.
Maya suddenly became seriously ill.
With a high fever and unbearable abdominal pain, she collapsed on the bed. Rudra hurriedly took her to a well-known private hospital in the city.
After examining her in the emergency department, the doctor said,
“She needs to be admitted immediately. Her appendix is on the verge of rupturing. She needs emergency surgery. Who are you to her? Please sign the form.”
Rudra froze, holding the pen.
What was he supposed to write under “relationship”?
“Husband”?
But that would be a lie.
“Friend”?
Would the hospital accept a friend’s signature?
Rudra said, “I am her partner. We live together.”
The employee at the counter frowned.
“Partner means what? Who is her legal guardian? Without a blood relative or a legal spouse, we cannot accept your signature on the surgical consent form. Who will take responsibility if something goes wrong?”
Rudra desperately replied, “I will take responsibility. I have been with her for four years. She is everything to me.”
“Sir, the law does not understand these things. Call her father or another legal relative.”
The employee’s voice was harsh.
Rudra’s heart trembled.
Maya was screaming in pain inside, while he was being stopped over a signature on a piece of paper.
Desperate, he called Maya’s father.
There was no response.
Then he called his own father.
After hearing everything, Rudra’s father said,
“Why should I sign for the girl you live with? You people don’t believe in society, and now that you are in trouble, you are looking for society?”
Tears burst from Rudra’s eyes.
He went to the hospital superintendent’s office and pleaded with him.
He remembered what Sukomal Babu had said.
Rudra explained to the superintendent that they were in a live-in relationship and that Indian law had recognized certain rights of live-in partners.
The superintendent’s humanity prevailed. He gave special permission and accepted Rudra’s signature.
As Rudra sat alone in the corridor outside the operating theatre, he kept thinking about the freedom they had wanted.
He wondered how high a price that freedom could sometimes demand.
A New Understanding
The operation was successful.
Maya recovered and returned home seven days later.
The lights came on again in their flat on Charuchandra Mitra Lane.
But this time, the light was different.
It carried the glow of sacrifice, pain, and a deeper understanding of love.
Maya was lying on the bed.
Rudra entered the room carrying a bowl of soup for her.
As he fed Maya the soup with a spoon, Rudra said,
“Maya, those few hours in the hospital were the most frightening hours of my life. I realized that society or legal documents may not be able to measure love, but in order to survive in this harsh world, we need certain forms of protection.”
Maya held Rudra’s hand.
Her body was still weak, but her eyes were strangely peaceful.
“Have you surrendered, Rudra? Are you now saying that the seven sacred rounds or a legal document are the ultimate truth?”
Rudra shook his head.
“No, Maya. I am not talking about surrender. I am talking about protection. Sukomal Babu came to see us this morning. He told me something that opened my eyes.”
He explained what Sukomal Babu had told him:
“Marriage is not merely about showing society that you are together. Marriage is a public declaration of legal and social responsibility toward each other. Living together is not a legal sin, but when you live within a larger society, you cannot completely ignore all of its rules.”
Rudra continued, “Maya, I don’t want to bind you with religious rituals or social extravagance. But I want to make sure that the next time I have to sign a hospital form, no one can stop me. Why don’t we register our relationship legally under the Special Marriage Act? Then society will have no reason to point fingers at us.”
Maya looked outside the window.
New flowers had blossomed on the krishnachura tree.
She turned toward Rudra and smiled.
“You know, when I was suffering in that hospital, I also thought—if I died, Rudra might not even have the legal right to claim my body. Society might not give him that right. Love exists in our hearts, but today I can no longer deny that it also needs some form of social bond.”
Maya rested her head against Rudra’s chest.
They were not saying goodbye to their live-in relationship. Rather, their live-in relationship was moving toward a more mature and secure conclusion.
They had realized that it was easy to turn one’s back on society, but the real courage lay in living according to one’s own principles while taking society along with them.
Freedom and Separation
Rudra once said, “Life is meaningless. We create our own meaning.”
Maya replied, “But if there is no stability in a relationship, how long can that meaning survive?”
Rudra had chosen freedom.
Maya had wanted stability.
The next morning Maya said, “I am leaving.”
Rudra looked at her in surprise. “Why?”
Maya calmly replied, “Because I can no longer live with this uncertainty.”
Rudra could not say anything.
A void formed inside him—a void he had never experienced before.
After Maya left, Rudra sat alone in the flat.
Everything was still there—but nothing was the same anymore.
He realized that freedom was good, but loneliness was terrifying.
Maya began a new life in a new city.
Yet a sense of emptiness remained within her too.
Meeting Again
A few months later, they met again.
They sat silently in a coffee shop.
Maya asked, “Were we wrong?”
“Not wrong… just incomplete.”
Rudra replied, “Not wrong… just incomplete.”
Their meeting did not erase what had happened between them. Instead, it gave them a deeper understanding of the relationship they had once tried to define only through freedom.
The Existential Crisis
Love is not merely a feeling.
It is a combination of responsibility, security, and commitment.
The balance between freedom and stability is what truly matters.
Rudra and Maya eventually understood this—but a little too late.
Freedom and stability are not necessarily opposites. Human relationships often require a balance between individual freedom, emotional security, responsibility and commitment.
Rudra and Maya’s live-in relationship was an existential crisis of modern human life.
They had believed that they could avoid society and live entirely according to their own terms.
But human beings are social animals, and it is difficult to live by completely rejecting the structures created by society.
Their experience became a reflection on the complicated relationship between personal freedom and social structures.
It raised questions about love, commitment, security, social recognition, personal choice, responsibility and the human need to belong.
Final Reflection
Perhaps their relationship was easier to break because it was not legally formalized.
But the deep scars left on the walls of their hearts— what law could ever erase them?
The joy of their live-in relationship was immediate, but the sadness and longing it left behind remained eternal.
Freedom and Stability
Love is not only about feeling free. It is also about responsibility, security and commitment. The deepest challenge is learning how to balance freedom with stability.
Abdur Rahim
7 July 2026
About the Writer
Abdur Rahim is a Shershabadia singer, songwriter, writer and creative thinker from West Bengal, India. His creative work explores language, culture, identity, human emotions, relationships and contemporary social realities.
“আদখ্যান আসমান” (Adhkhan Asman) is his original Shershabadia story. This English version, “Half the Sky, Half the Home,” brings the story to a wider readership while retaining its central themes of love, freedom, social legitimacy, security, commitment and existential uncertainty.
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Music
Comments
Post a Comment